g., geographical part, dimension off MA, dimension out of math results, sex, amount top, and you can book 12 months), i held the fresh heterogeneity shot. The newest Q attempt (heterogeneity test) have discovered the differences certainly one of effect items, ergo to explore which potential moderator (i.age., analysis features) may have played a job throughout these variations is actually required.
Geographic Part
Geographical places were thought a possible average basis. The result models was basically categorized to the four broad teams: Us, Europe, China and other counties. The new mathematical heterogeneity one of many effect items is actually shown (Q = , p = 0.01). Especially, the research which have Far-eastern samples met with the premier effect proportions (r = ?0.41), since the knowledge having Western european examples exhibited the tiniest effect size (r = ?0.21). Likewise, the research with our team samples had a larger impression size (r = ?0.30) than the relevant classification inside the Europe, because they had a smaller sized impact size than the relevant classification from inside the Asia.
Intercourse
This new moderate analyses on the intercourse were held thanks to a couple of methods. Very first, the class on this subject variable was in keeping with Ma’s (1999) studies, therefore we compared perhaps the mathematics stress-efficiency link are significantly various other among around three categories (men, women, and mixed); the results suggested there were zero variations among three classes (Q = 4.62, p = 0.099). 2nd, this study tended to expand after that to evaluate when to prohibit the newest confuse impression about mixed class and you may whether or not the average correlations between men and women was basically notably other. Just seven studies that provided new relationship anywhere between MA and you may mathematics efficiency otherwise vital information was gone to live in feeling items getting some other men and women have been integrated. The outcome recommended zero significant difference between females (roentgen = ?0.30) and you can males (roentgen = ?0.18) (Q = dos.73, p = 0.098).
Degree Level
Five values-level organizations was formed in this meta-study, and an elementary classification, junior large category, senior large group, combine category, and school category. The outcomes ideal this changeable had significant effects into the mathematics anxiety-efficiency link (Q = , p = 0.02). A great deal more particularly, the fresh older highest classification had the largest math anxiety-abilities link (r = ?0.44), accompanied by the fresh junior high group (r = ?0.39), university (roentgen = ?0.33), primary (roentgen = ?0.27), and blended group, which in fact had the smallest math nervousness-results connect (roentgen = ?0.21).
Publication Many years
The modern meta-studies contained the time figure out-of 19 years (2000–2018). To test whether go out got an effect on the fresh new mathematics stress-efficiency hook up, a good Pearson relationship try conducted amongst the publication ages therefore the of the many individual education (r = 0.twenty-seven, p > 0.05). Zero correlation was discover anywhere between impact versions together with publication age ( Figure 4 ).
Aspect from MA
We including explored whether the balances always try math stress had an effect on the fresh math nervousness-overall performance hook. The outcomes recommended that dimensions out of MA didn’t come with feeling on the mathematics nervousness-show hook up (Q = 6.54, p = 0.48). Especially, private studies that used https://datingranking.net/de/spanische-dating-sites/ other scales (age.g., the newest Mathematics Nervousness Size to possess Elementary University Children [MASESS; Bindak, 2005] met with the prominent math anxiety-results link (roentgen = ?0.41), followed by studies that used the newest MAS (r = ?0.40), MARS (r = ?0.35), MAQ (roentgen = ?0.28), MASYC (roentgen = ?0.26), CMAQ (roentgen = ?0.24), SEMA (r = ?0.24), and you may AMAS (r = ?0.24), and you will individual education which used the newest MASC encountered the littlest math anxiety-efficiency link (roentgen = ?0.15).
Dimensions of Mathematics Overall performance
The classification criteria used to code the “math performance” variable are different. In terms of the testing aspects of the math performance test, two skills were highlighted: calculation and problem solving. In this study, the measurement aspects of the test had significant effects on the math anxiety-performance link (Q = , p < 0.01). Studies that evaluated mixed math performance (calculation and problem solving) reported the largest effects (r = ?0.37). In addition, it is worth noting that studies in which the test assessed problem-solving skills in math performance reported larger effects (r = ?0.33), while studies that assessed the calculation ability in math performance reported smaller effects (r = ?0.21). In terms of the form of the math performance test, three types of math performance tests were identified: custom test, standardized test and others. There was a significant difference among these conditions (Q = , p = 0.001). The results suggested that studies that adopted a standardized test custom test reported larger effects (r = ?0.33) than studies that adopted a standardized test (r = ?0.28). Moreover, the studies that adopted other math tests reported the largest effects (r = ?0.51).